Ezekiel’s Prophecy of the Temple Essay

Ezekiel 40-48IntroductionThe Temple The advocate of the synagogue ought to be interpreted typographical errorly and non non vocally. This is beca employ it was given at a time when Ezekiel was still in captivity. Since Ezekiel was in captivity while stating this prophecy, this time was tangible and not figurative. Similarly, Ezekiels apocalyptic prophecies unravel to have close similarities with prophecies found in the revelations, which is another suggestion that the prophecy is to a greater extent(prenominal) literal than figurative. In Ezekiel 40-42, Ezekiel describes a temple that is to be constructed and would be used for worshiping for not only the Israelites but also the constitutional world. Since the temple being described has neer been constructed, it be aims pellucid that the prophecy is save to be fulfilled. In early chapters of Ezekiel 40, the prophet negotiation of being taken to Jerusalem in a quite a little. It is in this peck that he is shown a new tem ple. The cogitate wherefore the prophecy is more literal than figurative is because most prophecies are liberal. For instance, the same focusing perfection showed Ezekiel a real temple, a similar temple was shown to David, which was later on to be built by Solomon in Jerusalem when he was king. Hence, in my opinion, the temple that God showed Ezekiel leave alone also be built in Jerusalem. The other reason why Ezekiels prophecy was more literal than figurative is due to the elaborate covered in the chapters. Measurements of the temple walls as well as courtyards and gateways make the vision appear more literal. Although this vision is yet to be fulfilled, the bookof revelations states that there will be no temple constructed in the New Jerusalem since it is God and the birth that will represent the temple. Due to this revelation, it is unambiguous that the prophecy is literal since no temple will be constructed.Animal Sacrifices In Ezekiel 44-46, Ezekiel negotiation of sacri fices that will be offered in the new temple. This prophecy is also literal since it is difficult to believe that sacrifices will come into existence again in the future. In my opinion, this prophecy is literal since instead of sacrifices, the vision depicts memorial sacrifices similar to those that occurred during the first advance of saviour Christ such as the last supper. During the last supper, Jesus asked his disciples to use bread and wine in his commemoration. This implied that God prefers this form of commemoration quite than the fastness sacrifice. In my opinion, the sacrifice visualized in the temple by Ezekiel is more literal than symbolic since it represents the presence of Jesus rather than the literal animal sacrifice. Through this, it is evident that the temple visualized by Ezekiel will be fulfilled by Jesus second coming. In Ezekiel 45-46, he talks of a prince who will carry out his roles with justice and righteousness. For instance, when it comes to tax, this prince will ensure that he takes only what one can afford, this is in relation to ones financial ability. Due to this revelation, it becomes evident that the prophecy ought to be understood as literal and not figurative.ReferencesLa Sor, William Sanford, David Allan Hubbard, Frederic William Bush, and Leslie C. Allen. Old Testament play along The Message, Form and Background of the Old Testament. deluxe Rapids, Mich W.B. Eerdmans, 1996.Price, Randall. Ezekiels Prophecy of the Temple. World of the Bible. n.d. accessible at http//www.worldofthebible.com/Bible%20Studies/Ezekiel%27s%20Prophecy%20of%20the%20Temple.pdfReflections on the starting Testament. 2009. Available at http//garyeyates.blogspot.com/2009/12/temple-in-new-testament html. address document